“سؤال حلقة 14-10-2012 للبرنامج الإذاعي “البعد الأخر

من جهتي لست من محبي سلسلة رزدنت ايفل.
لكن الجزء الرابع اشوفه كان قفزة نوعية :)

السلام عليكم

احب اشكركم والموضوع على الجرح وطويل وعميق وبحاول اختصر جداًنقطه صغيره قبل الانطلاق
رزيدنت ايفل ماتت من بعد ما طلع منها من صنعها واخرجها للعالم وكل ترقيعات كابكم من بعده فاشله جداً الي حد الا اععانا لعبة بالترتيب مع صدورهم 1+2+3+كود فرونيكا+0+4+5الافضل والابداع 1+2+3+كود فرونيكا+5متوسط بين الجيلين 4 5 فشلسقوط 6الاسباب وبكل بساطه:-لم اقولك ارض مستطيله وعشب اخضر وفي جلد دائري شنو اسم الرياضه؟
الطبيعي بتقولي كورة

بكون غبي مثل كابكم واقول لك لا حداقهذا المثال ينطبق على اللعبه وسلسلتها وانا مقهور لاني من عشاقهالم اقولك رعبلغزسيرفايفلالنتجيه بتقولي رزيدنت ايفللكن الحين اقولي اللعبه لا لغز ولا رعب ولاسيرفايفلبعد جزئين اتوقع بتصير مثل جد اوف وروانا ضد كلياً الي يقول التغير افضل وبعطيك مثال بسيط وبختميالي تحب رزيدنت ايفل الافضل تغير بقولكتخيل افضل اللعابك تغيرك مثال على ذالكتخيل لعبة ميتيل جيل بالضبط صارت مثل جد اوف وار
راح تصير لعبه مختلفه بتقولي اي افضل تغير اللعب بقولك صارت لعبه ثانيه تحيل دوتا صارت تمشي بالماب ولم تشوف خصمك تسوي يصير هواش بينكم مثل ستريت فايتروبقولك تغير الجيم بلي احسن بتقولي لا صارت لعبه ثانيهوامثله واجد على هذالم تقولي مافي رعب وتقولي مافي لغز وتقولي مافي سيرفايفلوبالاضافه تقولي في اكشن وتقولي في طق وتقولي اخراجي فاشل في التصوير وغيرهبقولك اسمح لي اللعبه مو رزيدنت ايفل اروح اللعب لي اي لعبت قتل زومبي افضلالي نشوفه الحين من 5+6 هذا مو رزيدنت ايفل  هذا شي اسمه اتقل زومبيعفوا ولاتقولي تغير اللعب او الرسم وصارت اكشن هذا يعني ان اللعبه مو هيانت مو انت وانت مو لغز ورعب وسيرفايفلصدقني ان الموضوع يطول والمتذوق في فنون رزيدنت ايفل يعرف شنو اقصد من ساوند تراك واجواء واخراج وقصه ومفجأة ورعب وحبكه والخ.وشكراُ

I try my best to not make it long so i’ll spread my thoughts on points. NOTE: (I think this episode should be longer because it’s a reaaallyy biiig discussion so to include everyone’s thoughts on it. I think its plausible)1) The first RE game i played was RE: Director’s Cut on the PS1. Played them all, even the gun survivor, outbreak files ones (Decent). What i did not play was the remake, zero and revelations. However, i am waiting to play them all on a SPECIAL occassion so, i will play them. In 2009 for the first time i completed RE: Director’s Cut since it’s the one i didn’t complete from the ones i played (and also Code veronica, still didn’t complete it). It still holds up to this day and i enjoyed it emmnensly. Don’t see all the people who complain about the tank controls because you get used to them QUICK.2) Resident Evil defined a genre and made it’s own identity, it should have been stuck with it because what makes a game is it’s identity first of all. You can’t expect Halo to be Survival Horror FPS because that’s not what it is. Copying other identites only makes Resident evil lost and not knowing what it wants to be.3) It’s sad that half of the fans or more than half, only played RE4 and think that’s the BEST one when clearly it’s not. They never gave the old ones a chance or will never because they are never into Survival Horror’s in the first place.4)  Resident Evil was scary but people don’t know the type of scare that it is. It’s tension filled with scares spread on top. Low ammo, no save ribbons and having to progress but you know you’ll meet a new type of enemy or worse yet, a boss! The game also never holds your hands. I think where they evolved the scary-ness of the game is when they had Mr.X in RE2 appearing randomly + RE3 nemisis chasing you everywhere and mostly always appearing at the wrong times.5) Like how they evolved SF, this should have been treated the same. Keeping the same core concept but evolving it. One could argue that the game was inevitably going to be 3RD person action with horror elements game because the zombies were a failed experiment since Wesker’s entire plan was bio-terrorism in the first place. However, i feel they could have still kept that atmosphere + core concept intact while evolving it (See resident evil 3.5 fog version) not only that but they showed us in RE2, especially in RE3 that you could get out of buildings, traverse the city and have a grand adventure like feel.6) As for the new games, I don’t see them being amazing or great games. But, good games and i am enjoying them for what it is because i love the universe, characters and the story (no matter how simple it is, these are still characters that stayed with us for 16 years (1996 – 2012) and you gotta agree that nobody does zombies or mosters like crapcom do. (Alot of varied enemies/monsters in the recent RE6.)  For me though, Resident Evil will always be the originals. I’d pick that style over the new one’s any day of the week. Hopefully, the new RE will go to it’s roots and revamp it or maybe they’ll reboot it however i don’t see it likely because these are established, long time existing characters and universe. Unless they are willing to take risks which i welcome them.In the end, money talks and the market is easily accessible with action games because not everyone can be a survival horror fan but EVERYONE can be an action fan with horror elements (monsters besides normal enemies and scary looking places or atmosphere although the new games have very less of scary places/atmosphere)So of course, Crapcom is going to take the easy route to profit because the other is of course challenging but not impossible. If Shinji Mikami’s new game (z-hawi) sells, i see crapcom getting encouraged to go back to the roots.http://andriasang.com/con0st/shinji_mikami_zwei_interview/